- From: "Len Bullard" <Len.Bullard@s...>
- To: "Michael Hopwood" <michael@e...>,<xml-dev@l...>
- Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2012 11:02:21 -0600
Those are popular phrases but largely
meaningless unless further defined by the processes and kinds and types of data
to be integrated. For example, how much analysis is required of the integrated
sources, how are they QA’d and does that occur before or after the XML is
created given that XML is the final format for delivering an integrated
product?
len
From: Michael Hopwood [mailto:michael@e...]
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2012
10:52 AM
To: xml-dev@l...
Subject: RE: Should XML
Professionals Be Programmers?
So the problem space
is…? How does “information integration” or “data
integration” sound? That is one of the phrases I hear bandied around at
lot at present.
From: Michael Kay [mailto:mike@s...]
Sent: 08 March 2012 16:44
To: xml-dev@l...
Subject: Re: Should XML
Professionals Be Programmers?
On 08/03/2012 16:27, Len Bullard wrote:
It’s a general qualifications
question: do you expect an XML professional to:
There's no such thing as an XML
professional, any more than you can be a screwdriver professional or a
fork-lift truck professional. People who define their abilities by the tools
they can use proficiently are not professionals, they are technicians;
professionals define their capabilities in terms of the problem space, not the
solution space.
Michael Kay
Saxonica
|
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
|