[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

  • From: Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@g...>
  • To: John Cowan <cowan@m...>
  • Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2012 18:44:10 +0000

>> I think that if you have a straight-up name field, you either end up
>> being culturally obtuse or also needing a bunch of parallel fields for
>> various collation scenarios.
>
> That's what I meant by the field needing to be repeatable.  Chris
> Maden devised the system that $EMPLOYER is using, which involves
> personNameProfile elements which are themselves repeatable, and which have
> children for purpose, pattern (what order to put the textual elements in),
> the (meta-)name of this profile, full name, and five elements for name
> parts: givenName (repeatable), familyName (repeatable), prefix, suffix,
> nickname, and full name, all of which are optional.  There is continual
> pressure to add middleName, but so far we have effectively resisted it:
> canonical U.S. middle names are additional given names.

Straying off topic - why not use the foaf markup?


-- 
Andrew Welch
http://andrewjwelch.com


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]


Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member