- From: "Len Bullard" <cbullard@h...>
- To: "'Cox, Bruce'" <Bruce.Cox@U...>, "'Greg Hunt'" <greg@f...>, "'Petite Abeille'" <petite.abeille@g...>
- Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2012 18:11:03 -0600
“If anything, the,
hmmm, real world is anything but orderly”
Which is why the humans are in the loop.
Life is the best entropy reducer. .
Sampling works. Slow but it works.
Feedback systems will find a stable set even given multiple controls. Trouble
is, humans are all global variables. Unless the control is keeping track,
they converge around social systems instead of directed task systems.
Where social systems dominate, linear predictability is not as important as
proximate predictability. They are stable in the local domains and will
resist global values if they contravene local preference. Sampling is the
least intrusive basis for feedback.
Syntax preferences are styles too.
len
-----Original Message-----
From: Cox, Bruce
[mailto:Bruce.Cox@U...]
Sent: Monday, February 06, 2012
5:32 PM
To: Greg Hunt; Petite Abeille
Cc: xml-dev
Subject: RE: Should one
adopt the tag naming convention of an existing XML vocabulary or create one's
own tag naming convention?
To
give an example, the patent business model has been very stable for about a
hundred years. True, the vocabulary has changed, but since the Patent
Cooperation Treaty came into effect, even that has been fairly stable.
The more “abstract” the process, the more stable over time: invent,
apply, examine, grant or reject, publish. Those five steps describe
virtually every patent office in the world. Although there have been
about four major standards for the vocabulary since 1970, the differences are
in the details, not the basic concepts, and have been driven largely by
advances in technology and our understanding of it and our need for it, but not
by changes in business practice.
Bruce
B Cox
OCIO/AED/Software
Architecture and Engineering Division
571-272-9004
From: Greg Hunt
[mailto:greg@f...]
Sent: 2012 February 6, Monday
17:15
To: Petite Abeille
Cc: xml-dev
Subject: Re: Should one
adopt the tag naming convention of an existing XML vocabulary or create one's
own tag naming convention?
You
are constructing a straw man: I didn't use any of those words and you may have
missed the point. The terminology and usage in the business domain is
more stable and consistent than the collective opinions of a development team
that is working independently of the business domain. The fact that the
world changes and is messy does not mean that developer convenience trumps business
usage.
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 9:02 AM, Petite Abeille <petite.abeille@g...> wrote:
On Feb 6, 2012, at 10:28 PM, Greg Hunt wrote:
> The language and culture in the business domain are the only
> things that over time resist the entropy that developers naturally bring
to
> the design and maintenance of shared data structures.
Color me, hmmm, out-of-touch, but... in what world
does such an orderly, well defined, stable, never changing, clear, unambiguous
"business domain" exists?!?!
If anything, the, hmmm, real world is anything but orderly.
_______________________________________________________________________
XML-DEV is a publicly archived, unmoderated list hosted by OASIS
to support XML implementation and development. To minimize
spam in the archives, you must subscribe before posting.
[Un]Subscribe/change address: http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/
Or unsubscribe: xml-dev-unsubscribe@l...
subscribe: xml-dev-subscribe@l...
List archive: http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
List Guidelines: http://www.oasis-open.org/maillists/guidelines.php
|
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
|