• From: Rob Koberg <rob@k...>
• To: Amelia A Lewis <amyzing@t...>
• Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2012 19:37:04 -0800

> As Greg points out: do what you can to make it "feel" consistent for
> users.  For instance: camelCase for new types vs. hyphen-delimited for
> new actions.  One *can* distinguish between XSLT and WXS in that way:
> schema defines "things", xslt defines "actions".  So, hyphenate your
> actions, camelize your things.

better yet, caramelize your things.

• References:
  • Should one adopt the tag naming convention of an existing XMLvocabulary or create one's own tag naming convention?
    • From: "Costello, Roger L." <costello@m...>
  • Re: Should one adopt the tag naming convention of anexisting XML vocabulary or create one's own tag naming convention?
    • From: Greg Hunt <greg@f...>
  • Re: Should one adopt the tag naming convention of anexisting XML vocabulary or create one's own tag naming convention?
    • From: Amelia A Lewis <amyzing@t...>