• From: "O.J." <olivier.jeulin@g...>
• To: xml-dev@l...
• Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2012 23:54:28 +0100

Alex Muir <alex.g.muir@g...> a écrit :

>1 thing that cannot be cut and paste starting with 1 double click in an
>editor is no fun for me..
>
>Bad:
>condition-checks
>
>Good:
>condition_checks
>
>Best:
>conditionChecks
>
>from a clicking point of view

Choose a "programmer friendly" editor ;-) 
An editor that has no way to configure what characters defines a word is not a programmer's tool.
Even my terminal emulator(s) can do that. :-)

(You would love japanese and chinese: no separator between words :-P)

-- 
Envoyé de mon téléphone Android. Excusez la brièveté.

• References:
  • Should one adopt the tag naming convention of an existing XMLvocabulary or create one's own tag naming convention?
    • From: "Costello, Roger L." <costello@m...>
  • Re: Should one adopt the tag naming convention of anexisting XML vocabulary or create one's own tag naming convention?
    • From: Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@g...>
  • Re: Should one adopt the tag naming convention of anexisting XML vocabulary or create one's own tag naming convention?
    • From: Uche Ogbuji <uche@o...>
  • RE: Should one adopt the tag naming convention of an existing XML vocabulary or create one's own tag naming convention?
    • From: "David Lee" <dlee@c...>
  • Re: Should one adopt the tag naming convention of anexisting XML vocabulary or create one's own tag naming convention?
    • From: Alex Muir <alex.g.muir@g...>