• From: Petite Abeille <petite.abeille@g...>
• To: xml-dev <xml-dev@l...>
• Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2012 23:02:34 +0100

On Feb 6, 2012, at 10:28 PM, Greg Hunt wrote:

>   The language and culture in the business domain are the only
> things that over time resist the entropy that developers naturally bring to
> the design and maintenance of shared data structures.

Color me, hmmm, out-of-touch, but... in what world does such an orderly, well defined, stable, never changing, clear, unambiguous "business domain" exists?!?! 

If anything, the, hmmm, real world is anything but orderly.

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Should one adopt the tag naming convention of anexisting XML vocabulary or create one's own tag naming convention?
    • From: Greg Hunt <greg@f...>

• References:
  • Re: Should one adopt the tag naming convention of anexisting XML vocabulary or create one's own tag naming convention?
    • From: Uche Ogbuji <uche@o...>
  • RE: Should one adopt the tag naming convention of anexisting XML vocabulary or create one's own tag naming convention?
    • From: "Cox, Bruce" <Bruce.Cox@U...>
  • RE: Should one adopt the tag naming convention of anexisting XML vocabulary or create one's own tag naming convention?
    • From: "Costello, Roger L." <costello@m...>
  • Re: Should one adopt the tag naming convention of an existing XML vocabulary or create one's own tag naming convention?
    • From: Petite Abeille <petite.abeille@g...>
  • Re: Should one adopt the tag naming convention of anexisting XML vocabulary or create one's own tag naming convention?
    • From: Greg Hunt <greg@f...>
  • Re: Should one adopt the tag naming convention of anexisting XML vocabulary or create one's own tag naming convention?
    • From: cbullard@h...
  • Re: Should one adopt the tag naming convention of anexisting XML vocabulary or create one's own tag naming convention?
    • From: Greg Hunt <greg@f...>