• From: Michael Kay <mike@s...>
• To: xml-dev@l...
• Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 20:47:13 +0000

On 13/12/2011 19:04, Jirka Kosek wrote:
> On 13.12.2011 18:41, Michael Kay wrote:
>
>> Am I right in thinking that
>>
>> (a) there's nothing really in the specs to justify the convention of
>> using<system>  rather than<uri>  for this purpose
> Yes, DITA has it clearly wrong.
>
>
It turns out the schema collection I was sent was DITA 1.1, and the 
problem has been fixed in DITA 1.2 by adding <uri> entries as well as 
<system> entries. So it seems to be a false alarm. Thanks for the responses!

Michael Kay
Saxonica

• References:
  • OASIS catalogs: <system> and <uri> entries
    • From: Michael Kay <mike@s...>
  • Re: OASIS catalogs: <system> and <uri> entries
    • From: Jirka Kosek <jirka@k...>