• From: John Cowan <cowan@m...>
• To: Michael Kay <mike@s...>
• Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 13:24:54 -0500

Michael Kay scripsit:

> (a) there's nothing really in the specs to justify the convention of
> using <system> rather than <uri> for this purpose

As chief instigator and committee member of the OASIS XML Catalog TC, I
can say authoritatively that <system> was meant to be used for system
IDs only, and a fortiori for DTDs only.  All arbitrary URI remapping is
intended to be achieved with <uri> and/or <uriRewrite>.

> (b) nevertheless, it is established practice, and therefore
>
> (c) the Saxon schema processor ought to work this way?

IMO, if the DITA catalogs use <system>, that is a bug, and should be
filed as a bug against DITA.

-- 
My corporate data's a mess!                     John Cowan
It's all semi-structured, no less.              http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
    But I'll be carefree                        cowan@c...
    Using XSLT
On an XML DBMS.

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: OASIS catalogs: <system> and <uri> entries
    • From: Jirka Kosek <jirka@k...>

• References:
  • OASIS catalogs: <system> and <uri> entries
    • From: Michael Kay <mike@s...>