• From: John Cowan <cowan@m...>
• To: Michael Kay <mike@s...>
• Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2011 15:01:58 -0400

Michael Kay scripsit:

> I've previously proposed something close to this, but with the rules  
> defined at the XML syntax level:

This seems like a very clever design.

> The namespace :org.w3c.xml and corresponding prefix "xml" are always in  
> scope even though there is no containing element in this namespace.

Does this mean that namespaces like :foo:bar:xml are not permitted?
I'd be okay with that.

-- 
You know, you haven't stopped talking           John Cowan
since I came here. You must have been           http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
vaccinated with a phonograph needle.            cowan@c...
        --Rufus T. Firefly