• From: John Cowan <cowan@m...>
• To: xml-dev@l...
• Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 15:55:20 -0400

Daniela Florescu scripsit:

> We are thinking about 2.0, 3.0 support, but we are not sure
> yet. Should we ? That would be more serious investment. If we get such
> feedback, we'll probably do it, but might take a while.
>
> How many XSLT 2.0 and 3.0 processors are out there ? How many people
> use XSLT 1.0 vs. 2.0 ?

Currently, there is only one XSLT 2.0 processor, and that's Saxon.
The full set of XSLT 2.0 features are available only in the commercial
product, so a full open-source XSLT 2.0 would I think be welcomed.
In addition, a second source for an important standard is invaluable.

-- 
John Cowan  cowan@c...  http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
Does anybody want any flotsam? / I've gotsam.
Does anybody want any jetsam? / I can getsam.
        --Ogden Nash, No Doctors Today, Thank You

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Re: [ANN] Zorba 2.0: complete XQuery/XSLT processor(C++,open source, Apache license)
    • From: Michael Kay <mike@s...>
  • Re: Re: [ANN] Zorba 2.0: complete XQuery/XSLT processor(C++,open source, Apache license)
    • From: Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@g...>
  • RE: Re: [ANN] Zorba 2.0: complete XQuery/XSLT processor(C++,open source, Apache license)
    • From: Geert Josten <geert.josten@d...>