• From: David Carlisle <davidc@n...>
• To: stephengreenubl@g...
• Date: Mon, 09 May 2011 16:55:04 +0100

On 09/05/2011 16:43, Stephen D Green wrote:
> I tried to think of a way to write the XPath expression so
> it gives the same result whatever the version of XPath

As I said, the xpath that you posted originally would have the same 
behaviour. If it is acting differently it is because you have changed 
the default xpath2 behaviour for unprefixed elements.

 > 
/*[local-name()='a'][namespace-uri()='http://example.com']/@version-id = 0.4

 > I could hardly expect a nominally XML-savvy developer to
 > have to understand and maintian this.

fortunately that is not needed and you can do as you did in xpath 1
/default:a/@id=0.4
together with a binding of "default" to http://www.example.org.

David

________________________________________________________________________
The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd is a company registered in England
and Wales with company number 1249803. The registered office is:
Wilkinson House, Jordan Hill Road, Oxford OX2 8DR, United Kingdom.

This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is
powered by MessageLabs. 
________________________________________________________________________

• References:
  • Concerned about the increasing reliance on XPath
    • From: "Costello, Roger L." <costello@m...>
  • Re: Concerned about the increasing reliance on XPath
    • From: Stephen D Green <stephengreenubl@g...>
  • Re: Concerned about the increasing reliance on XPath
    • From: David Carlisle <davidc@n...>
  • Re: Concerned about the increasing reliance on XPath
    • From: Stephen D Green <stephengreenubl@g...>