• From: David Carlisle <davidc@n...>
• To: Jesper Tverskov <jesper.tverskov@g...>, "xml-dev@l..." <xml-dev@l...>
• Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 20:24:31 +0100

On 18/05/2011 20:18, Jesper Tverskov wrote:
> John Cowan scripsit:
>> Structural schemas are insufficient to capture all the restrictions of
>> valid XHTML5.  It would be possible to write a schema for XHTML5 (probably
>> a RELAX NG one), but it would be laxer than the requirements of HTML5 validity.
>
> I guess the above is no longer true for XML Schema 1.1?
>
> Cheers,
> Jesper Tverskov
> http://www.xmlplease.com
>
> _______________________________________________________________________

v.nu uses relax schema (mainy) augmented with schematron and 
(increasingly) augmented with custom java code.

David

• References:
  • XHTML 5 and validation
    • From: Jesper Tverskov <jesper.tverskov@g...>
  • Re: XHTML 5 and validation
    • From: Jirka Kosek <jirka@k...>
  • Re: XHTML 5 and validation
    • From: Jesper Tverskov <jesper.tverskov@g...>
  • Re: XHTML 5 and validation
    • From: Jirka Kosek <jirka@k...>
  • Re: XHTML 5 and validation
    • From: Jesper Tverskov <jesper.tverskov@g...>
  • Re: XHTML 5 and validation
    • From: John Cowan <cowan@m...>
  • Re: XHTML 5 and validation
    • From: Jesper Tverskov <jesper.tverskov@g...>