[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Hi Folks,
Here simpleType "A" is the base of simpleType "B":
<xs:simpleType name="A">
<xs:restriction base="xs:string">
<xs:pattern value="[a-z]{10}" />
</xs:restriction>
</xs:simpleType>
<xs:simpleType name="B">
<xs:restriction base="A">
<xs:pattern value="[a-z]{20}" />
</xs:restriction>
</xs:simpleType>
Is that legal?
After all, clearly the pattern facet in "B" is not a restriction (subset) of the pattern facet in "A".
Further, how does it differ from this, where the two pattern facets are embedded in the same simpleType:
<xs:simpleType name="C">
<xs:restriction base="xs:string">
<xs:pattern value="[a-z]{10}" />
<xs:pattern value="[a-z]{20}" />
</xs:restriction>
</xs:simpleType>
Is "C" equivalent to "A" plus "B"?
Scroll down to see the answers ...
This is perfectly legal:
<xs:simpleType name="A">
<xs:restriction base="xs:string">
<xs:pattern value="[a-z]{10}" />
</xs:restriction>
</xs:simpleType>
<xs:simpleType name="B">
<xs:restriction base="A">
<xs:pattern value="[a-z]{20}" />
</xs:restriction>
</xs:simpleType>
The pattern facet in "B" does not have to restrict/subclass the pattern facet in "A". In fact, the pattern facets are completely independent.
The pattern facets are "and-ed" together. Consider this element, Test, declared to be of type "B":
<xs:element name="Test" type="B" />
The value of "B" must consist of the letters a-z and the length must be exactly 10 characters AND exactly 20 characters. Obviously that is impossible, so Test has no valid value.
Compare the above two simpleTypes against this simpleType:
<xs:simpleType name="C">
<xs:restriction base="xs:string">
<xs:pattern value="[a-z]{10}" />
<xs:pattern value="[a-z]{20}" />
</xs:restriction>
</xs:simpleType>
Pattern facets within a simpleType are "or-ed" together. Suppose the element, Test, is declared to be of type "C":
<xs:element name="Test" type="C" />
The value of Test must consist of the letters a-z and the length must be exactly 10 characters OR exactly 20 characters. So either of these is valid:
<Test>abcdefghijabcdefghij</Test>
<Test>abcdefghij</Test>
Recap:
1. The pattern facets within a simpleType are "or-ed" together.
2. The pattern facets in a base simpleType and the sub-simpleType are "and-ed" together.
3. The pattern facets in a sub-simpleType do not have to restrict/subclass the patterns in the base simpleType.
/Roger
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] |

Cart



