• From: Dave Pawson <davep@d...>
• To: xml-dev@l...
• Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 15:04:01 +0100

On Tue, 12 Apr 2011 14:03:17 +0100
Stephen D Green <stephengreenubl@g...> wrote:

> It occurs to me though that this is an example of a situation
> where each component needs to be kept self-contained so
> that it can be portable and this might determine how test cases
> are written and even, by follow-through, how TAs are written
> and maybe even how specs might better be written. I think,
> from what I've heard from others, there would be a few challenges
> to overcome if you were to use Schematron though (e.g. how
> to apply several tests to the same context and prerequisites),
> just as perhaps with XML Schema 1.1, especially given a lot of TAs.
> ----
> Stephen D Green

I think you'll find Schematron up to your challenges Stephen



-- 

regards 

-- 
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk

• References:
  • [Summary] Portable Data Components
    • From: "Costello, Roger L." <costello@m...>
  • Re: [Summary] Portable Data Components
    • From: Stephen D Green <stephengreenubl@g...>
  • RE: [Summary] Portable Data Components
    • From: "David Lee" <dlee@c...>
  • Re: [Summary] Portable Data Components
    • From: Stephen D Green <stephengreenubl@g...>