• From: John Cowan <cowan@m...>
• To: Liam R E Quin <liam@w...>
• Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2011 17:51:24 -0400

Liam R E Quin scripsit:

> The more abstract pattern is that Schema has avoided the idea of a
> descendent changing the meaning of an element.

Rather, of changing its content model -- not the same thing.

-- 
John Cowan    cowan@c...    http://ccil.org/~cowan
The present impossibility of giving a scientific explanation is no proof
that there is no scientific explanation. The unexplained is not to be
identified with the unexplainable, and the strange and extraordinary
nature of a fact is not a justification for attributing it to powers
above nature.  --The Catholic Encyclopedia, s.v. "telepathy" (1913)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Abandon the (mistaken) belief that XML attributesprovide "metadata" and set yourself free to explore capability-based designs
    • From: Liam R E Quin <liam@w...>

• References:
  • Abandon the (mistaken) belief that XML attributes provide"metadata" and set yourself free to explore capability-based designs
    • From: "Costello, Roger L." <costello@m...>
  • Re: Abandon the (mistaken) belief that XML attributesprovide "metadata" and set yourself free to explore capability-based designs
    • From: James Fuller <james.fuller.2007@g...>
  • Re: Abandon the (mistaken) belief that XML attributesprovide "metadata" and set yourself free to explorecapability-based designs
    • From: John Cowan <cowan@m...>
  • Re: Abandon the (mistaken) belief that XML attributesprovide "metadata" and set yourself free to explore capability-based designs
    • From: Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@g...>
  • Re: Abandon the (mistaken) belief that XML attributesprovide "metadata" and set yourself free to explore capability-based designs
    • From: Liam R E Quin <liam@w...>