Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Kurt Cagle scripsit:
> What this points to is that either the corresponding JSON libs would
> need to be adapted to properly parse XML blocks (which would be lovely,
> but which I'd say is about as likely as Hixie suddenly becoming an
> ardent XML-phile),
Oh, I see; you want a conventional way of *embedding* XML in pure JSON,
as opposed to an *extension* of JSON. I didn't realize that. In that
case, I'd rather use the style in which
<a href="http://example.com">This is <i>mixed</i> text</a>
becomes
{"#name" : "a",
"#attrs" : {"href" : "http://example.com"},
"#children" : [
"This is ",
{"#name" : "i",
"#attrs" : {},
"#children" : ["mixed"]},
" text"]}
Verbose, but it requires only one parser, not two.
--
John Cowan cowan@c... http://ccil.org/~cowan
If I have seen farther than others, it is because I was standing on
the shoulders of giants.
--Isaac Newton
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] |
