• From: John Cowan <cowan@m...>
• To: mike@s...
• Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 16:29:02 -0500

Michael Kay scripsit:

> The IBM spec looks very similar to David Lee's: more concise because
> it omits the MEMBER element, but at the cost of some loss of semantic
> clarity, in my view. A string in JSON does not have a name property;
> rather, a member of an object has a name and a value, and the value
> may be a string.

I think that can be repaired by changing the wording from "If a string
has a property name" to "When a string element denotes a property within a
JSON object".

-- 
On the Semantic Web, it's too hard to prove     John Cowan    cowan@c...
you're not a dog.  --Bill de hOra               http://www.ccil.org/~cowan

• References:
  • #Announce published JXML schema, an XML schema for representingthe JSON data model
    • From: Richard Salz <rsalz@u...>
  • Re: #Announce published JXML schema, an XML schema forrepresenting the JSON data model
    • From: Michael Kay <mike@s...>