• From: John Cowan <cowan@c...>
• To: "Christopher R. Maden" <crism@m...>
• Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 12:50:59 -0500

On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 11:48 AM, Christopher R. Maden <crism@m...> wrote:

> If we can enumerate a set of features and come up with a standard syntax
> for expressing those features, then there could be a means of
> negotiation in which one application says, “If you support these
> features, you can handle my content,” and another application can make a
> determination of whether it is adequate.

That's what the Content-Type: header was meant for.  If MicroXML ever
reaches standardization, a media type of "application/microxml" will
be appropriate.

• References:
  • MicroXPath proposal
    • From: John Cowan <johnwcowan@g...>
  • Re: MicroXPath proposal
    • From: Michael Kay <mike@s...>
  • Re: MicroXPath proposal
    • From: Stephen Green <stephengreenubl@g...>
  • Re: MicroXPath proposal
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
  • Re: MicroXPath proposal
    • From: "Christopher R. Maden" <crism@m...>