[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

  • From: David Carlisle <davidc@n...>
  • To: xml-dev@l...
  • Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 11:50:57 +0000

On 06/12/2010 11:37, Michael Kay wrote:
>  >I don't know of any language where comments have to be syntactically
> correct, it's essentially equivalent to saying that there are no comments.
>
> In XSD, xs:annotation has to be well-formed.

True, so you often see schema with xml <!-- comments instead (or as well)

random example

http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-SVG11-20020108/SVG.xsd

which has both comments and annotations.

structured annotation like xs:annotation or mathml's annotation-xml 
seems to be fundamentally different thing from comments.


annotation is adding structured content to the document
commenting is removing a span of text from the document as seen by the 
parser.

There are of course overlapping use cases and grey areas, but....

David


________________________________________________________________________
The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd is a company registered in England
and Wales with company number 1249803. The registered office is:
Wilkinson House, Jordan Hill Road, Oxford OX2 8DR, United Kingdom.

This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is
powered by MessageLabs. 
________________________________________________________________________


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]


Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member