[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

  • From: Stephen Green <stephengreenubl@g...>
  • To: Uche Ogbuji <uche@o...>
  • Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 20:51:51 +0000

I would imagine Examplotron would be most
easy for a micro parser writer to compare to
the MicroXML instance for validation. Would
it benefit from any profiling for micro-*? Or is
copyright, etc an issue there?
----
Stephen D Green



On 17 December 2010 20:13, Uche Ogbuji <uche@o...> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 9:50 AM, David Carlisle <davidc@n...> wrote:
>>
>> On 17/12/2010 14:33, Pete Cordell wrote:
>>>
>>> The idea was that an example of your XML data could be your schema.
>>
>>
>> similar to
>>
>> http://examplotron.org/
>
> Yeah, you beat me to that.  See also:
>
> http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/xml/library/x-xmptron/
>
> The nice thing about Examplotron is its XSLT 1.0 implementation (I also have
> a specialized Python implementation).  I've used it heavily for client work,
> and I can say that clients tend to love it.
>
>
> --
> Uche Ogbuji                       http://uche.ogbuji.net
> Weblog: http://copia.ogbuji.net
> Poetry ed @TNB: http://www.thenervousbreakdown.com/author/uogbuji/
> Founding Partner, Zepheira        http://zepheira.com
> Linked-in: http://www.linkedin.com/in/ucheogbuji
> Articles: http://uche.ogbuji.net/tech/publications/
> Friendfeed: http://friendfeed.com/uche
> Twitter: http://twitter.com/uogbuji
> http://www.google.com/profiles/uche.ogbuji
>


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]


Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member