Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
On 10/12/2010 10:10, Stephen Green wrote: > The xml:json would not need a schema to distinguish an unordered list or array > from a sequenced one so the parser would know whether to treat the order as > significant without having to load and understand a schema or be programmed > with being able to read different kinds of schema language, etc. That seems to > me a crucial difference and there may be others. yes but that doesn't answer the question as to why it would be useful to do that in a general XML context, as in my xpath example, why would it be useful to know it's a sequence of integers if you don't know everything else you needed to know about evaluating xpath (or json) and if you do know how to evaluate xpath it's not too hard to know that it is contained in particular attributes. (x)html doesn't need a schema to tell it that what is in a script element is javascript/json David ________________________________________________________________________ The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd is a company registered in England and Wales with company number 1249803. The registered office is: Wilkinson House, Jordan Hill Road, Oxford OX2 8DR, United Kingdom. This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is powered by MessageLabs. ________________________________________________________________________
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] |
