• From: Amelia A Lewis <amyzing@t...>
• To: XML Developers List <xml-dev@l...>
• Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 10:15:37 -0500

Small change, large consequences.  Attributes then either accumulate 
values (so foo="bar" foo="baz" results in a pseudo-normalized foo="bar 
baz"), on the model of HTTP headers, or sequence begins to matter for 
attributes (they become effectively simple-typed elements).  If 
sequence matters, existing APIs that assume that ordering doesn't 
matter break.  Canonicalization must take a different approach.

*shrug*  I don't think this is a win.  The element/attribute 
distinction is currently interesting (attributes are unique-in-scope, 
elements may reappear; attribute sequence isn't significant, element 
sequence may); this would reduce it to "attributes are simple types; 
elements may be complex."

Amy!
On Thu, 9 Dec 2010 14:22:28 +0000, Stephen Green wrote:
> Has anyone yet suggested the allowing of multiple attributes with the
> same name to enable a more succinct XML (more comparable to JSON)?
> 
> Regards
> 
> Stephen D Green
> 
> _______________________________________________________________________
> 
> XML-DEV is a publicly archived, unmoderated list hosted by OASIS
> to support XML implementation and development. To minimize
> spam in the archives, you must subscribe before posting.
> 
> [Un]Subscribe/change address: http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/
> Or unsubscribe: xml-dev-unsubscribe@l...
> subscribe: xml-dev-subscribe@l...
> List archive: http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
> List Guidelines: http://www.oasis-open.org/maillists/guidelines.php
> 

• References:
  • Multiple instances of an attribute Re: Towards XML 2.0
    • From: Stephen Green <stephengreenubl@g...>