• From: Rob Cameron <robc@i...>
• To: Richard Salz <rsalz@u...>
• Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 09:38:38 -0800

How about a predefined root element such as "xmle"?   Such
an element name is reserved in XML 1.0, so should not be
in general use for any application that is concerned with
interoperability.

Thus a document opening <xmle> could be processed
according to the subset rules, with other documents
processed according to XML 1.0.



On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 9:03 AM, Richard Salz <rsalz@u...> wrote:
>> How do I tell whether it's safe to use my uXML parser instead of my
>> (heavier) XML 1.0 + Namespace in XML + XML:Base + XML:ID + whatever
>> parser?
>
> Does that have to be identified in the document, as opposed to out of
> band?  Such as application configuration, fallback on failure, HTTP header
> :), etc?
>
>
> --
> STSM, WebSphere Appliance Architect
> https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/blogs/soma/
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
>
> XML-DEV is a publicly archived, unmoderated list hosted by OASIS
> to support XML implementation and development. To minimize
> spam in the archives, you must subscribe before posting.
>
> [Un]Subscribe/change address: http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/
> Or unsubscribe: xml-dev-unsubscribe@l...
> subscribe: xml-dev-subscribe@l...
> List archive: http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
> List Guidelines: http://www.oasis-open.org/maillists/guidelines.php
>
>

• References:
  • MicroXML
    • From: James Clark <jjc@j...>
  • Re: MicroXML
    • From: Amelia A Lewis <amyzing@t...>
  • Re: MicroXML
    • From: Richard Salz <rsalz@u...>