[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

  • From: Michael Sokolov <sokolov@i...>
  • To: Norman Gray <norman@a...>
  • Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2010 13:39:35 -0500

That's nifty, Norman: I guess I'll have to vote +10 in order 
counter-weight Dimitre :)  I've often longed for that kind of 
abbreviated syntax for programming XML. I find proper indentation makes 
programs more readable than close tags, anyway.  Actually to my eye, the 
verbosity of XSLT cum XML makes it fairly opaque: there's a lot of 
clutter that has to be ignored.  Possibly this only proves that beauty 
is subjective.

cheers

-Mike

On 12/12/2010 7:50 AM, Norman Gray wrote:
> This seems a good point at which to chip in a link to a long-term 
> hobby project of mine: http://nxg.me.uk/dist/lx/
> Lx defines a much-compressed syntax for XML, which is still XML in the sense that parsing it produces a sequence of (Java) SAX events.



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]


Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member