• From: COUTHURES Alain <alain.couthures@a...>
• To: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Date: Sun, 05 Dec 2010 22:39:37 +0100

Le 05/12/2010 21:44, Simon St.Laurent a écrit :
> On 12/5/10 3:34 PM, COUTHURES Alain wrote:
>> The graph vs. tree modeling has benefits because it's a database.
>
> What percentage of web developers would even be interested in that?
>
Web developers now use frameworks to process data to obtain, for 
example, sortable tables with filters. There is only Javascript at 
browser-side and JSON is easier for frameworks developers. But there is 
no standardization in data format between frameworks which can even mix 
functions with data. Choose the wrong framework for your web application 
and you will have to rewrite it completely.

JSON is worse than XML 1.0 for graphs and a new notation with its 
associated query language would surely help to have small autonomous 
databases in browsers which could even be used offline.

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Where is XML going
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• References:
  • Where is XML going
    • From: "David Lee" <dlee@c...>
  • Re: Where is XML going
    • From: Ben Trafford <ben@p...>
  • RE: Where is XML going
    • From: "David Lee" <dlee@c...>
  • Re: Where is XML going
    • From: Michael Kay <mike@s...>
  • RE: Where is XML going
    • From: "David Lee" <dlee@c...>
  • Re: Where is XML going
    • From: Peter Hunsberger <peter.hunsberger@g...>
  • Re: Where is XML going
    • From: David Lee <dlee@c...>
  • Re: Where is XML going
    • From: Ben Trafford <ben@p...>
  • RE: Where is XML going
    • From: "David Lee" <dlee@c...>
  • RE: Where is XML going
    • From: Ben Trafford <ben@p...>
  • Re: Where is XML going
    • From: Rob Koberg <rob@k...>
  • Re: Where is XML going
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
  • Re: Where is XML going
    • From: COUTHURES Alain <alain.couthures@a...>
  • Re: Where is XML going
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>