[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

  • From: James Clark <jjc@j...>
  • To: Amelia A Lewis <amyzing@t...>
  • Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 17:14:15 +0700

On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 1:00 PM, Amelia A Lewis <amyzing@t...> wrote:
The question,
which I think is important, is how to safely use a small, fast MicroXML
parser--rather than starting to use it, throwing away the results, and
falling back to an XML parser.

I don't see faster parsing in contexts where arbitrary XML is expected as being part of the value proposition of MicroXML. 

Ah, well.  It appears that this proposal is targeted
primarily-nearly-exclusively toward bridging XML with HTML5?

That's only part of it.  But I also think there's significant value to having a subset of XML that provides most of the utility of XML but is much easier to understand.

James


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]


Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member