• From: <vojtech.toman@e...>
• To: <xml-dev@l...>
• Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 09:47:07 -0500

(I had sent this email earlier today, but it seems to have gone lost somewhere. My apologies if you get it twice.)

> Is Hand Authored XML really an important issue nowadays ?

I assume you came to this question with JSON in mind. An interesting perspective arises when you compare JSON's (see json.org):

  "[JSON] is easy for humans to read and write."

to XML's (see XML design goals):

  "XML documents should be human-legible and reasonably clear."
  "XML documents shall be easy to create."

The XML design goals do not seem to imply that hand-authoring of XML be always possible/easy; JSON, on the the hand, seems to be more explicit about being hand-authoring friendly. (But of course, without defining what "to write"/"to create" actually mean, this is just one of the N possible interpretations...)

Vojtech

--
Vojtech Toman
Consultant Software Engineer
EMC | Information Intelligence Group
vojtech.toman@e...
http://developer.emc.com/xmltech

• References:
  • Is "Hand Authoring" XML still a critical use case ?
    • From: "David Lee" <dlee@c...>
  • Re: Is "Hand Authoring" XML still a critical use case ?
    • From: Dave Pawson <davep@d...>
  • RE: Is "Hand Authoring" XML still a critical use case ?
    • From: "David Lee" <dlee@c...>
  • Re: Is "Hand Authoring" XML still a critical use case ?
    • From: Philip Fearon <pgfearo@g...>
  • RE: Is "Hand Authoring" XML still a critical use case ?
    • From: <vojtech.toman@e...>
  • Re: Is "Hand Authoring" XML still a critical use case ?
    • From: "John A. Walsh" <jawalsh@i...>
  • RE: Is "Hand Authoring" XML still a critical use case ?
    • From: <vojtech.toman@e...>