• From: Dave Pawson <davep@d...>
• To: xml-dev@l...
• Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 12:12:10 +0000

On Fri, 10 Dec 2010 10:43:32 +0000
Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@g...> wrote:


> Yep - the "UTF-8/16 only" suggestion is to solve the problem of the
> potential mismatch between the encoding in the prolog and the actual
> encoding.. add to that the content-type when http is involved and you
> have 3 areas to look at to determine the encoding...


Was this the elders being too hopeful? 
I intend to use utf-8 ... but I just put that in because
my tool does it automatically when I open an xxx.xml document?

The best intentions but a #fail?

What are the alternatives... if any?
Some app to analyse/guess the encoding and propose changes/
set the encoding? Is such a beast possible?


-- 

regards 

-- 
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk

• References:
  • relax UTF-8 default? was: Towards XML 2.0
    • From: Stephen Green <stephengreenubl@g...>
  • Re: relax UTF-8 default? was: Towards XML 2.0
    • From: David Carlisle <davidc@n...>
  • Re: relax UTF-8 default? was: Towards XML 2.0
    • From: Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@g...>