• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• To: Ben Trafford <ben@p...>
• Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2010 12:39:41 -0500

On 12/3/10 12:15 PM, Ben Trafford wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-12-03 at 11:08 +1100, Doug wrote:
>> i.e. instead of:
>>    <?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
>>    <?xml-stylesheet href="convertXML2HTML.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
>>    ...
>> why not promulgate:
>>
>>    <?xml-javascript href="convertXML2HTML.js" type="text/javascript"?>
>
> I'd say "in addition to," but otherwise, I like this idea very much.

Maybe <?xml-script , since type identifies JavaScript?

Not that I see VBScript returning, but you never know what else might 
appear.

-- 
Simon St.Laurent
http://simonstl.com/

• References:
  • Re: RE: James Clark: XML versus the Web
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
  • Re: RE: James Clark: XML versus the Web
    • From: Ben Trafford <ben@p...>
  • Re: RE: James Clark: XML versus the Web
    • From: Doug <doug.duboulay@g...>
  • Re: RE: James Clark: XML versus the Web
    • From: Ben Trafford <ben@p...>