• From: Michael Sokolov <sokolov@i...>
• To: Ben Trafford <ben@p...>
• Date: Sun, 05 Dec 2010 09:48:35 -0500

On 12/4/2010 10:39 PM, Ben Trafford wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-12-04 at 22:16 -0500, Kurt Cagle wrote:
>>          For a comment syntax, what's wrong with
>>          <xml:comment>....</xml:comment>?
>>
>> But that's ... that's ...
>>
>>
>> That's actually a very decent idea.
> I'll third that.
>
> --->Ben
metoo, but let's please allow for nesting this time.  Extremely useful, 
and not too hard to implement if you parse the contents of the comment 
loosely (can't expect well-formedness, but can just search for 
</xml:comment\s*>)

-Mike

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Towards XML 2.0
    • From: Greg Hunt <greg@f...>

• References:
  • Towards XML 2.0
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@i...>
  • Re: Towards XML 2.0
    • From: "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@c...>
  • Re: Towards XML 2.0
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@i...>
  • Re: Towards XML 2.0
    • From: Dave Pawson <davep@d...>
  • Re: Towards XML 2.0
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@i...>
  • Re: Towards XML 2.0
    • From: Michael Kay <mike@s...>
  • Re: Towards XML 2.0
    • From: Kurt Cagle <kurt.cagle@g...>
  • Re: Towards XML 2.0
    • From: Ben Trafford <ben@p...>