• From: Michael Kay <mike@s...>
• To: xml-dev@l...
• Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2010 13:05:31 +0000

>
> PS: probably everyone on this list is already aware of this, but SAX 
> stands for Simple API for XML.  To support MicroXML, we would want an 
> even simpler one; Micro-API: MAX? uAX?.

Have you tried XMLStreamWriter? As an event-based push API, it's a 
delight to use compared to SAX, whether you're sending or receiving.

I think that because it's part of StAX, which is perceived as a pull 
interface, XMLStreamWriter has received less attention than it deserves.

Michael Kay
Saxonica

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Never mind the browser, let's do MicroXML
    • From: Michael Sokolov <sokolov@i...>

• References:
  • Never mind the browser, let's do MicroXML
    • From: Uche Ogbuji <uche@o...>
  • Re: Never mind the browser, let's do MicroXML
    • From: Liam R E Quin <liam@w...>
  • Re: Never mind the browser, let's do MicroXML
    • From: Uche Ogbuji <uche@o...>
  • Re: Never mind the browser, let's do MicroXML
    • From: Rob Koberg <rob@k...>
  • Re: Never mind the browser, let's do MicroXML
    • From: Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@g...>
  • Re: Never mind the browser, let's do MicroXML
    • From: Joe English <jenglish@f...>
  • Re: Never mind the browser, let's do MicroXML
    • From: Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@g...>
  • Re: Never mind the browser, let's do MicroXML
    • From: Mike Sokolov <sokolov@i...>