[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Looking through the original compact syntax for RELAX NG. http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/relax-ng/compact-20021121.html Hmm. How close would that get you to a theoretical &mgr;XSD, if you backed out namespaces? ~ James Bryce Clark ~ General Counsel, OASIS ~ http://www.oasis-open.org/who/staff.php#clark On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 6:43 AM, Stephen Green <stephengreenubl@g...> wrote: > Now we have 'Micro XML', can't have a Micro XML Schema (Micro XSD)? > > What would it be? > no namespaces means no imports for a start ... > What would be its role, since the schema might not necessarily > be readable in all parsers capable of parsing Micro XML? Or would > we want a version of XML Schema which could be so parsed? > Or would we be more likely to recommend alternatives? > > Would it be classed as an early implementation of Micro XML? > Would be now revisit the whole XML stack and recreate it or > profile it for Micro XML? > ---- > Stephen D Green > > _______________________________________________________________________ > > XML-DEV is a publicly archived, unmoderated list hosted by OASIS > to support XML implementation and development. To minimize > spam in the archives, you must subscribe before posting. > > [Un]Subscribe/change address: http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/ > Or unsubscribe: xml-dev-unsubscribe@l... > subscribe: xml-dev-subscribe@l... > List archive: http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/ > List Guidelines: http://www.oasis-open.org/maillists/guidelines.php > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] |

Cart



