• From: Chris Burdess <dog@b...>
• To: Michael Sokolov <sokolov@i...>
• Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 09:06:47 +0000

Michael Sokolov wrote:
>> Do you think there is enough in your proposal to make, for example,
>> some of the major players, build a parser and other tools to support
>> it Michael?
>> 
> Good question, Dave - I guess my thought that was smaller change would be *easier* to get implemented, but perhaps that is naive: ho-humness could doom it.  One thing I like about this incremental approach though is that much of the benefit can be realized *only* with a new parser.  I know a parser is complicated, but with some of the complexity removed, it would actually be much simpler to create a new one.

However, I don't see anything in your proposal that reduces complexity. More features and "looser" interpretation of the data makes parsers more complicated, not less. 
-- 
Chris Burdess

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: choosing sides
    • From: Michael Sokolov <sokolov@i...>

• References:
  • choosing sides
    • From: Michael Sokolov <sokolov@i...>
  • Re: choosing sides
    • From: Dave Pawson <davep@d...>
  • Re: choosing sides
    • From: Michael Sokolov <sokolov@i...>