• From: "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@c...>
• To: "Elliotte Rusty Harold" <elharo@i...>,"Dave Pawson" <davep@d...>
• Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 15:11:56 -0000

I agree with Elliotte that we're probably not talking about 1 thing at the 
moment.  I'm happy to change the name at anytime it seems appropriate.

Pete Cordell
Codalogic Ltd
Interface XML to C++ the easy way using C++ XML
data binding to convert XSD schemas to C++ classes.
Visit http://codalogic.com/lmx/ or http://www.xml2cpp.com
for more info

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Elliotte Rusty Harold" <elharo@i...>
To: "Dave Pawson" <davep@d...>
Cc: "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@c...>; <xml-dev@l...>
Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2010 1:13 PM
Subject: Re:  Pete's blend for XMLlite



On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 7:59 AM, Dave Pawson <davep@d...> wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Dec 2010 12:19:58 -0000
> "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@c...> wrote:
>
>>
>> It's at:
>>
>> http://codalogic.com/xmllite/xmllite.html
>
>
> Can we get this naming issue out of the way, to reduce confusion?
> For my 2 cents worth XML 2.0 is a non-starter, due respect to W3C.
>
> Simple XML,
> XMLLite
> What else?
>
> Has anyone access to a 'survey' type of site so we can vote on one of
> the ones suggested?

I'm virtually certain we're not talking about the same thing. :-)

I can live without a name for the time being. My own views are
evolving, based on this discussion, and I'm not sure where I'm going,
much less where everyone else is. But I do think I'm starting to see a
way forward. Whether it's worth going there, I'm not sure yet. I
intend to continue listening and then issue a revised proposal if it
seems to make sense.

-- 
Elliotte Rusty Harold
elharo@i...

• References:
  • Pete's blend for XMLlite
    • From: "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@c...>
  • Re: Pete's blend for XMLlite
    • From: Dave Pawson <davep@d...>
  • Re: Pete's blend for XMLlite
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@i...>