• From: Dave Pawson <davep@d...>
• To: stephengreenubl@g...
• Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 11:02:51 +0000

On Fri, 24 Dec 2010 09:16:05 +0000
Stephen Green <stephengreenubl@g...> wrote:
 So how 'easy' would it be to include this in
> validating MicroXML parsers (if there ever are such things)? Perhaps
> easier than having to implement something like XSD which isn't valid
> as XSD; perhaps less risky anyway.

This is a schema, so I can use it today,
with nxml-mode/emacs for editing,
with Jing for validating.

Not sure what more I'd need?


-- 

regards 

-- 
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Micro XSD for Micro XML?
    • From: Stephen Green <stephengreenubl@g...>
  • Re: Micro XSD for Micro XML?
    • From: Stephen Green <stephengreenubl@g...>

• References:
  • Micro XSD for Micro XML?
    • From: Stephen Green <stephengreenubl@g...>
  • Re: Micro XSD for Micro XML?
    • From: Michael Kay <mike@s...>
  • Re: Micro XSD for Micro XML?
    • From: Olivier Rossel <olivier.rossel@g...>
  • RE: Micro XSD for Micro XML?
    • From: "Costello, Roger L." <costello@m...>
  • Re: Micro XSD for Micro XML?
    • From: Stephen Green <stephengreenubl@g...>
  • Re: Micro XSD for Micro XML?
    • From: Stephen Green <stephengreenubl@g...>
  • Re: Micro XSD for Micro XML?
    • From: Michael Kay <mike@s...>
  • Re: Micro XSD for Micro XML?
    • From: Stephen Green <stephen.green@d...>
  • Re: Micro XSD for Micro XML?
    • From: Stephen Green <stephen.green@d...>
  • Re: Micro XSD for Micro XML?
    • From: Stephen Green <stephen.green@d...>
  • Re: Micro XSD for Micro XML?
    • From: Dave Pawson <davep@d...>
  • Re: Micro XSD for Micro XML?
    • From: Stephen Green <stephengreenubl@g...>