[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Rich Salz wrote: > Of course it has a zillion (technical term :) false positives. Rich, would you elaborate upon this please? Assume the DTD defines correctly the content of correct XML documents. You have an example of a correct XML document that fails DTD validation? That is, you have an example of a used namespace that is incorrectly identified as an unused namespace? /Roger -----Original Message----- From: Richard Salz [mailto:rsalz@u...] Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 10:40 AM To: Costello, Roger L. Cc: xml-dev@l... Subject: RE: My report on experiments with unused namespaces > Conclusion: it appears that one mechanism for detecting unused > namespaces in an XML document is to validate it against a DTD. Can > anyone think of a case where a DTD would not detect an unused namespace? Of course it has a zillion (technical term :) false positives. /r$ -- STSM, WebSphere Appliance Architect https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/blogs/soma/
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] |

Cart



