• From: David Carlisle <davidc@n...>
• To: xml-dev@l...
• Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 02:30:38 +0100

On 18/08/2010 21:46, Michael Kay wrote:
> With XSLT it's a little less likely that anyone would do anything very
> useful with a stylesheet other than execute it, but it's certainly a
> theoretical possibility.

Although one of the main reasons that xslt is xml is so that it can be 
used as source data rather than being executed (often so that it can be 
transformed by another xslt stylesheet).

David

• References:
  • Data Interoperability ... Why do some XML vocabularies specifymeaning + behavior whereas others specify only meaning?
    • From: "Costello, Roger L." <costello@m...>
  • Re: Data Interoperability ... Why do some XML vocabulariesspecify meaning + behavior whereas others specify only meaning?
    • From: Michael Kay <mike@s...>