• From: Dave Pawson <davep@d...>
• To: Michael Kay <mike@s...>
• Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 17:02:18 +0100

On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 14:24:34 +0100
Michael Kay <mike@s...> wrote:

> 
> > sure (although don't get me started on the 5th edn [1]:-) but 
> > presumably there was some constituency  asking loud enough for
> > EBCDIC flavoured line endings in XML for the core WG to attempt to
> > add them in 1.1.
> >
> 
> "loud" is probably the operative word. I would hazard a scenario like 
> this: chief architect at major bank has discussion on golf course
> with IBM account manager about future of mainframes in data centre.

No Michael, highly unlikely!
Now if you were to suggest a croquet lawn..... :-)


-- 

regards 

-- 
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk

• References:
  • hackable xml
    • From: Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@g...>
  • Re: hackable xml
    • From: Stephen Green <stephengreenubl@g...>
  • Re: hackable xml
    • From: Michael Kay <mike@s...>
  • Re: hackable xml
    • From: "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@c...>
  • Re: hackable xml
    • From: David Carlisle <davidc@n...>
  • Re: hackable xml
    • From: "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@c...>
  • Re: hackable xml
    • From: David Carlisle <davidc@n...>
  • Re: hackable xml
    • From: Michael Kay <mike@s...>