[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
At 2010-05-08 21:07 +0000, stephengreenubl@g... wrote: >Like you say though, we need to cater for fine grained contexts. >Maybe CAM is useful in this case. >Also Schematron. Well, now I think you are getting away from your initial premise, which I understood to be divining meaning from interpreting ontological relationships to schema constructs. >They allow, I think, contexts beyond even parent >/ child. The context could be any >Xpath. >A table with one column as an >XPath and another as an RDFXML fragment which refers, say to a >RDF or OWL ontology might do it. Hmmmmmm ... interesting. >Just inserting RDF into XSD might >only suffice for when the context is simple. > >Context association files? I think not ... OASIS Context/Value Association (CVA) files[1] associate document contexts with value constraints, where the value constraints are expressed either as XPath expressions or values from genericode files. It isn't clear to me how they would help. . . . . . . . . . . . Ken [1] CVA files are now an OASIS Committee Specification ... documentation and schemas are linked from the namespace RDDL document: http://docs.oasis-open.org/codelist/ns/ContextValueAssociation/1.0/ -- XSLT/XQuery training: after http://XMLPrague.cz 2011-03-28/04-01 Vote for your XML training: http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/x/i/ Crane Softwrights Ltd. http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/x/ G. Ken Holman mailto:gkholman@C... Male Cancer Awareness Nov'07 http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/x/bc Legal business disclaimers: http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/legal
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] |

Cart



