• From: Liam R E Quin <liam@w...>
• To: Max Toro <maxtoroq@g...>
• Date: Thu, 20 May 2010 13:48:49 -0400

On Thu, 2010-05-20 at 13:30 -0400, Max Toro wrote:
> As a hardcore XSLT fan I'm not too excited about XProc, maybe I'm
> missing something.

You could think of xproc as replacing a "runme" shell script or batch
file, or a Makefile, that calls XSLT maybe multiple times.

For example
(1) run XSLT on the input with gather-parts.xsl
(2) run xinclude processing
(3) validate
(4) run XSLT on the result using simplify.xsl
(5) run XSLT again, using make-html.xsl

So, XProc is not competing with XSLT in any way.

Liam

-- 
Liam Quin - XML Activity Lead, W3C, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/
Pictures from old books: http://fromoldbooks.org/
Ankh: irc.sorcery.net irc.gnome.org www.advogato.org

• References:
  • XProc for the XSLT developer
    • From: Max Toro <maxtoroq@g...>