Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Could this go any way, perhaps, to solving the subset problem mentioned in previous thread? http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/200908/threads.html#00318 Here I asked about ways to instruct processors to regard an instance as one modeled as a subset of a schema such that the instance should be valid both by the schema and by some definition of the subset (which could be Schematron or a list of XPaths, say). Best regards Steve --- Stephen D Green 2010/2/16 Jirka Kosek <jirka@k...>: > Edd Dumbill wrote: >>> and the desire for parallelism with the xml-stylesheet PI used >>> to associate stylesheets with XML documents, ISO's SC 34/WG1 has >>> requested to be able to use 'xml-model' for a PI target in an >>> optional processing instruction that would allow the association >>> of schemas with XML documents. >> >> I'll bite on this one. Why would one not use 'xml-schema'? > > xml-model is one character shorter so in sum it will save a lot of space > and processing power. So it is perfectly aligned with the current "green > computing" trend ;-) > > There were several proposals on the table including xml-schema, but if > my recollection is right, counter argument against xml-schema was that > it can lead to false conclusion that this PI is suitable only for use > with W3C XML Schema and not with other schema languages like Schematron > and RELAX NG. > > Jirka > > -- > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > Jirka Kosek e-mail: jirka@k... http://xmlguru.cz > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > Professional XML consulting and training services > DocBook customization, custom XSLT/XSL-FO document processing > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > OASIS DocBook TC member, W3C Invited Expert, ISO JTC1/SC34 member > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] |
