• From: Edd Dumbill <edd@u...>
• To: Uche Ogbuji <uche@o...>
• Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 12:11:07 -0800

On Feb 16, 2010, at 12:03 PM, Uche Ogbuji wrote:
> Then again, "xml-schema" doesn't *have* to mean XSD.  For example, xml-schema...type=application/xml+fakey-relaxng...

This was my point. People don't really associate 'model' with defining what is valid in an XML document, they use the word 'schema', regardless of predilection or otherwise for XSD.

> Oh wait!  e.g. RELAX NG doesn't have a MIME type... Uh oh ;)

Hehe. And further to my point, RELAX NG self-identifies as a "schema language for XML" per relaxng.org.

-- Edd

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Draft of W3C Note available for review: Associating Schemas with XML documents 1.0
    • From: Uche Ogbuji <uche@o...>

• References:
  • Draft of W3C Note available for review: Associating Schemas with XML documents 1.0
    • From: ht@i... (Henry S. Thompson)
  • Re: Draft of W3C Note available for review: Associating Schemas with XML documents 1.0
    • From: Edd Dumbill <edd@u...>
  • Re: Draft of W3C Note available for review: AssociatingSchemas with XML documents 1.0
    • From: Jirka Kosek <jirka@k...>
  • Re: Draft of W3C Note available for review: Associating Schemas with XML documents 1.0
    • From: Edd Dumbill <edd@u...>
  • Re: Draft of W3C Note available for review: Associating Schemas with XML documents 1.0
    • From: Uche Ogbuji <uche@o...>