• From: Edd Dumbill <edd@u...>
• To: xml-dev@l...
• Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 11:41:13 -0800

On Feb 16, 2010, at 10:35 AM, Edd Dumbill wrote:
> It's just this kind of thing that gets XML a bad name. The horse of XML Schema bolted a long time ago. Making clarity suffer in the name of correctness is a poor decision.


This is a little ungracious of me, I should add that the idea that the Note itself sets out is a great one. Simple and usable. Just a shame not to go the extra mile and make it obviously-named.

-- Edd

• References:
  • Draft of W3C Note available for review: Associating Schemas with XML documents 1.0
    • From: ht@i... (Henry S. Thompson)
  • Re: Draft of W3C Note available for review: Associating Schemas with XML documents 1.0
    • From: Edd Dumbill <edd@u...>
  • Re: Draft of W3C Note available for review: AssociatingSchemas with XML documents 1.0
    • From: Jirka Kosek <jirka@k...>
  • Re: Draft of W3C Note available for review: Associating Schemas with XML documents 1.0
    • From: Edd Dumbill <edd@u...>