• From: "Len Bullard" <cbullard@h...>
• To: "'Liam Quin'" <liam@w...>, "'Tim Bray'" <Tim.Bray@S...>
• Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 22:45:52 -0600

Also agree.  We tried it with markup a couple of times.  It's data. Full
stop.

len


From: Liam Quin [mailto:liam@w...] 

On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 11:49:03AM -0800, Tim Bray wrote:
> It seems to me at a pretty deep level that O-O is
> about hiding and encapsulation; an object is a thing that can do some
things
> on demand, don't bother your pretty little head about how it's done.  
> 
> It seems to me like XML is oriented exactly 180? in the opposite
direction:
> Here's the data, here are some labels for the data, here are some ordering
> and containment relationships, you're free to do whatever you want with
it.

+1

> That's a good thing and (I've always the big win) - the provider doesn't
> constrain what the receiver does.  -Tim

Yup, agreed 100% - it's why you can't speak of an XML document as
a function, but, rather, an XML processor is a function that takes
one or more XML documents as inputs...

The semantics in XML are extrinsic, not intrinsic.

Liam

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: An inquiry into the nature of XML and how it orientsour perception of information
    • From: Mukul Gandhi <gandhi.mukul@g...>

• References:
  • Re: An inquiry into the nature of XML and how it orientsour perception of information
    • From: Liam Quin <liam@w...>