• From: rjelliffe@a...
• To: "Olivier Rossel" <olivier.rossel@g...>
• Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 03:51:07 +1000 (EST)

> could you elaborate on that relax NG + schematron?
> i can understand that chaining relax validation and schematron
> processing is definitely possible.
>
> but as far as i understand, they are no integration effort between them.

Eddie Robertsson's software to embed Schematron rules in RELAX NG has been
around since about 2001.

Also both Schematron and RELAX NG are part of ISO DSDL: one
long-time-coming part of DSDL is a pipelining execution framework, with
XProc the candidate. The challenge I see with DSDL is not so much to
integrate RELAX NG and Schematron (why dilute one?)  as to integrate the
other parts of DSDL with them.

Cheers
Rick Jelliffe

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Content Assembly Mechanism (CAM)
    • From: Philippe Poulard <philippe.poulard@s...>

• References:
  • Content Assembly Mechanism (CAM)
    • From: Cecil New <cecil.new@g...>
  • Re: Content Assembly Mechanism (CAM)
    • From: Olivier Rossel <olivier.rossel@g...>
  • Re: Content Assembly Mechanism (CAM)
    • From: Lech Rzedzicki <xchaotic@g...>
  • Re: Content Assembly Mechanism (CAM)
    • From: Olivier Rossel <olivier.rossel@g...>