• From: Michael Ludwig <mlu@a...>
• To: XML Developers List <xml-dev@l...>
• Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 17:30:02 +0200

Michael Ludwig schrieb:
> Michael Kay schrieb:

>> I think we are looking for a format that allows you to cross
>> implementation boundaries.
>
> Yes, but if I remember correctly (not sure I do, actually), a
> motivation for this quest was efficiency in a pipeline, which
> precludes an XML round-trip.

I may have confused this thread and another one, where one Pavel
Minaev made a contribution on the .NET implementation featuring
an IXPathNavigable interface that I found very interesting:

[xquery-talk] Tool development: by Perl-wrapped XQuery
http://www.x-query.com/pipermail/talk/2009-September/003503.html

Those ideas aren't about serialization. Still, they're good.

-- 
Michael Ludwig

• References:
  • Serialization of XDM
    • From: "David A. Lee" <dlee@c...>
  • Re: Serialization of XDM
    • From: Michael Ludwig <mlu@a...>
  • RE: Serialization of XDM
    • From: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>
  • Re: Serialization of XDM
    • From: Michael Ludwig <mlu@a...>