[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Michael Ludwig wrote: > Michael Kay schrieb: >> Some people have been suggesting using a subset of XQuery syntax, >> others have been saying it would be better to use XML syntax. >> >> It occurs to me one might achieve both objectives at the same time by >> using a subset of XSLT syntax. > > Reuse is always good. Less new stuff to learn. Honestly. > I like this idea too (XSLT based syntax). Question : This is "reuse" of a kind at the schema./documentation level, although it would have to be re-documented because I suspect it cant be 100% the same. BUT ... Could it also be "reuse" at the application level ? Is there implementations (say saxon) where you can parse an XSLT document and return it as an XDM Value ? That is, suppose 'execute' the XSLT and have it "output" XDM in that implementations native type system. I don't know enough about XSLT to know the answer to that. David A. Lee dlee@c... http://www.calldei.com http://www.xmlsh.org 812-482-5224
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] |

Cart



