• From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@i...>
• To: Michael Kay <mike@s...>
• Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 15:07:40 -0700

On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 2:57 PM, Michael Kay<mike@s...> wrote:

> Perhaps the notion of "metalanguage" or "language in which one can define
> markup languages for documents" is over-emphasising the role of the DTD,
> when one of the major contributions of XML is to make the DTD optional.

I don't think either "metalanguage" or "language in which one can
define markup languages for documents" implies a DTD. But perhaps we
should instead say, "syntax in which one can create markup languages
for documents". "Creating" does not bring to mind the concept of a
schema quite so readily as "defining".

-- 
Elliotte Rusty Harold
elharo@i...

• References:
  • Re: Wikipedia on XML
    • From: Tim Bray <Tim.Bray@S...>
  • Re: Wikipedia on XML
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@i...>
  • RE: Wikipedia on XML
    • From: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>
  • Re: Wikipedia on XML
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@i...>
  • RE: Wikipedia on XML
    • From: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>