• From: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>
• To: "'Liam Quin'" <liam@w...>,"'Tim Bray'" <Tim.Bray@S...>
• Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 00:45:09 +0100

> also, it can't 
> easily be made compatible with things like ch.cern.html 
> (later org.ietf.html, and then org.w3.html, of course, and 
> also ch.iso.html...)

That's not fair. The current namespace scheme can't handle variants of a
vocabulary at all well, so if someone is trying to come up with something
simpler, the fact that it doesn't solve that problem either is no big deal.

Regards,

Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/
http://twitter.com/michaelhkay 

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Pragmatic namespaces
    • From: 'Liam Quin' <liam@w...>

• References:
  • Re: Pragmatic namespaces
    • From: Tim Bray <Tim.Bray@S...>
  • Re: Pragmatic namespaces
    • From: Micah Dubinko <Micah.Dubinko@m...>
  • Re: Pragmatic namespaces
    • From: Tim Bray <Tim.Bray@S...>
  • Re: Pragmatic namespaces
    • From: Liam Quin <liam@w...>