• From: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>
• To: "'Costello, Roger L.'" <costello@m...>,<xml-dev@l...>
• Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 13:54:37 +0100

> What about XLink, is it being pursued by either standards 
> groups or by implementors?


Well, for better or worse, XLink is actually used, for example in XBRL, but
I think all the associated processing logic (and there isn't much) generally
goes in the application, exactly as if the application had defined the links
as part of its own vocabulary.

Regards,

Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/
http://twitter.com/michaelhkay 

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: XPointer is dead. What about XLink?
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• References:
  • XPointer is dead. What about XLink?
    • From: "Costello, Roger L." <costello@m...>